A Comparative Returns Performance Review of Islamic Equity Funds with Socially Responsible Equity Funds and the Broader Market Indices
Keywords:
slamic mutual funds, capital asset pricing model, returns, systematic risk, market volatility.Abstract
Islamic mutual funds and socially responsible mutual funds are two similar asset classes that incorporate negative screens in their portfolio selection process to filter out stocks that fail to meet certain ethical, social, environmental, and/or religious standards. This study uses a single-factor capital asset pricing model and an adjusted sample consisting of 224 Islamic funds and 573 socially responsible funds to examine their excess risk-adjusted returns, market volatility, and systematic risk. It also gauges the market-timing abilities of the fund managers concerned in relation to both Islamic/socially responsible and conventional market indices. While there are some differences in the risk factors of Islamic funds and socially responsible funds, both are associated with lower risks and have the same market-timing ability.
References
Abdelsalam, O., Fethi, M. D., Matallín, J. C., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2014). On the comparative performance of socially responsible and Islamic mutual funds [Supplement]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 103, 108–128.
Abdullah, F., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S. (2007). Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds: Comparison with conventional unit trust funds. Managerial Finance, 33(2), 142–153.
Cuthbertson, K., Nitzsche, D., & O’Sullivan, N. (2010). The market timing ability of UK mutual funds. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 37(1–2), 270–289.
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.
Ernst & Young. (2012). The world Islamic banking competitiveness report 2012/13: Growing beyond: DNA of successful transformation. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/The_World_Islamic_Banking_Competitiveness_Report/$FILE/World%20Islamic%20Banking%20Competitiveness%20Report%202012-13.pdf
Fama, E., & French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
Forte, G., & Miglietta, F. (2011). A comparison of socially responsible and Islamic equity investments. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 21, 116–132.
Geczy, C., Stambaugh, R. F., & Levin, D. (2005). Investing in socially responsible mutual funds. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA.
Goodhart, C. A. E. (2008). The regulatory response to the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 4(4), 351–358.
Gregory, A., & Whittaker, J. (2007). Performance and performance persistence of ‘ethical’ unit trusts in the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34(7–8), 1327–1344.
Hayat, R., & Kräussl, R. (2011). Risk and return characteristics of Islamic equity funds. Emerging Markets Review, 12(2), 189–203.
Hoepner, A. G., Rammal, H. G., & Rezec, M. (2011) Islamic mutual funds’ financial performance and international investment style: Evidence from 20 countries. European Journal of Finance, 17(9–10), 829–850.
Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416.
Jiang, W. (2003). A nonparametric test of market timing. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(4), 399–425.
Kon, S. J. (1983). The market-timing performance of mutual fund managers. Journal of Business, 56(3), 323–347.
Patro, D. K. (2001). Measuring performance of international closed-end funds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25(9), 1741–1767.
Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113.
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–322.
Treynor, J. L., & Mazuy, K. K. (1966). Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review, 44, 131–136.
