Pakistan: A Case of Premature Deindustrialization?
Keywords:
industrialization, premature deindustrialization, manufactures, manufacturing, structural change, growth, exports, sophistication of productionAbstract
While “deindustrialization” is now considered normal for developed countries, recent trends show that many developing countries have seen their share of manufacturing employment peak at far earlier levels of income than in advanced countries. This new occurrence, which blocks off the main avenue for a country to catch up with more advanced economies, has been called “premature
deindustrialization.” As a result of stagnation in manufacturing since 2007, Pakistan is on the brink – if not already in the process – of premature deindustrialization. This paper focuses on (i) growth trends in manufacturing and the economy, (ii) developments in the context of premature deindustrialization in Pakistan, and (iii) the change in the country’s structure of industry.
We adapt and apply the industrial sophistication index developed by Lall, Weiss, and Zhang (2005) to the Pakistan Standard Industrial Classifications in the Census of Manufacturing Industries. The structure of industry in Pakistan, Sindh, and Punjab is mapped from 1990–99 to 2005/06 (2010/11 for Punjab) on the basis of a sophistication index score. Our analysis substantiates the conclusion that Pakistan’s industrial structure has stagnated, drawing on analyses of export data in other studies. It also indicates that our finding of
modest upgrading in the industry sector on the basis of an intuitive division of industries into low-technology and high-technology industries may have been too optimistic. Revitalizing manufacturing growth will require Pakistan to once again adopt a proactive industrial policy to address the constraints and weaknesses of the manufacturing sector.
References
Ahmed, H., Hamid, N., & Mahmud, M. (2015). Exports: Lessons from the past and the way forward. In R. Amjad & S. J. Burki (Eds.), Pakistan: Moving the economy forward (pp. 135–170). New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
Ahmed, H., Mahmud, M., Hamid, N., & Rahim, T. (2010). A strategy for reversing Pakistan’s dismal export performance (Policy Paper No. 01-10). Lahore: Centre for Research in Business and Economics.
Bogliaccini, J. A. (2013). Trade liberalization, deindustrialization, and inequality: Evidence from middle-income Latin American countries. Latin American Research Review, 48(2), 79–105.
Dasgupta, S., & Singh, A. (2006). Manufacturing, services and premature deindustrialization in developing countries: A Kaldorian analysis (Research Paper No. 2006/49). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
Felipe, J. (2007). A note on competitiveness and structural transformation in Pakistan (ERD Working Paper No. 110). Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Felipe, J., Mehta, A., & Rhee, C. (2014). Manufacturing matters… but it’s the jobs that count (Economics Working Paper No. 420). Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Hamid, N., & Hayat, S. (2012). The opportunities and pitfalls of Pakistan’s trade with China and other neighbors [Special edition]. Lahore Journal of Economics, 17, 271–292.
Hamid, N., Nabi, I., & Zafar, R. (2014). The textiles and garments sector: Moving up the value chain [Special edition]. Lahore Journal of Economics, 19, 283–306.
Hausmann, R., & Klinger, B. (2007). The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage (CID Working Paper No. 146). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2006). Doomed to choose: Industrial policy as predicament. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2005). What you export matters (CID Working Paper No. 123). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
International Chamber of Commerce. (2013). ICC Open Markets Index 2013. Paris: ICC Research Foundation.
Jenkins, R., & Barbosa, A. (2012). Fear for manufacturing? China and the future of industry in Brazil and Latin America. The China Quarterly, 209, 59–81.
Kim, C. S., & Lee, S. (2014). Different paths of deindustrialization: Latin American and Southeast Asian countries from a comparative perspective. Journal of International and Area Studies, 21(2), 65–81.
Lall, S., Weiss, J., & Zhang, J. (2005). The ‘sophistication’ of exports: A new measure of product characteristics (QEH Working Paper No. 123). Oxford: Oxford University.
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Industry [Webpage]. Retrieved September 13, 2015, from http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/industry
Pakistan, Ministry of Finance. (2015). Pakistan economic survey 2014–15. Retrieved from http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1415.html
Reis, J. G., & Taglioni, D. (2013). Pakistan: Reinvigorating the trade agenda (Policy Paper Series on Pakistan No. PK 15/12). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Rodrik, D. (2014). The past, present, and future of economic growth. In F. Allen, J. R. Behrman, N. Birdsall, S. Fardoust, & A. Subramanian (Eds.), Towards a better global economy: Policy implications for citizens worldwide in the 21st century (chap. 2). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2015). Premature deindustrialization (Working Paper No. 20935). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Shafaeddin, S. M. (2005). Trade liberalization and economic reform in developing countries: Structural change or deindustrialization? (Discussion Paper No. 179). Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
State Bank of Pakistan. (n.d.). Economic data [Database]. Available at http://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/index2.asp#real.
United Nations Statistics Division. (2015). UN Comtrade [Database]. Available at http://comtrade.un.org/data/
Wood, A., & Mayer, J. (2011). Has China deindustrialized other developing countries? Review of World Economics, 147(2), 325–350.
World Bank. (2015). Data [Database]. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/PX.REX.REER
