Sustainable Development through Science and Technology

Authors

  • Tariq Husain Advisor, Center for Research on Poverty Reduction and Income Distribution, Planning Commission, Pakistan

Abstract

After 50 years of nationhood, about 60 million Pakistani citizens still live in absolute poverty, a condition so debasing that it robs the poor of the very potential of their genes. Illiteracy, malnutrition, and high maternal, child, and infant mortality afflict more than 50% of Pakistan’s population of 144 million. Due to mismanagement of its human and natural resources, Pakistan is in a vicious cycle of economic dependence (Figures 2 & 3) with high indebtedness, low growth rates of exports and GDP, and a decaying education system. During the last two decades, Pakistan has engaged in firefighting through external debt re-schedulings and increasing its dependence on the Bretton Woods institutions (World Bank, International Monetary Fund) and their richer shareholders. As a result, the important development needs of the nation’s human capital have been grossly neglected. It has failed to develop its human capital, particularly its domestic scientific and engineering communities, and thus is not ready to meet the growth challenges of the 21st century. It is postulated that Pakistan must, on a crash basis, develop a domestic scientific and technology (S&T) community and create a scientific infrastructure if it seeks to become economically and politically self-reliant. With about 100 scientists/engineers per million population, Pakistan’s current S&T capacity is woefully inadequate to capitalize on the wealth of opportunities that are becoming available through globalization. The S&T capacities of Pakistan’s competitors in the world marketplace are significantly higher (300 per million for India; 600 per million for China; 2,600 per million for Korea). Pakistan needs both enhanced S&T capacity and the associated education system if it is to increase the “science-cum-knowledge content” of its exports and GDP. This is a sine qua non for achieving expanded economic well-being.

References

Abdus Salam. (1989). Notes on science, technology, and science education in the development of the South. Third World Academy of Sciences. Published for the 5th meeting of the South Commission.

Ayub, K. O. (1988). The rise and decline of science in Islam. Al Razi Lecture at the Islamic Medical Association of North America, July 1988.

Kazi, M. A. (n.d.). The need for integrated S&T policies for Islamic countries: The role of COMSTECH. In H. M. Said (Ed.), Essays on science in honour of Dr. M. A. Kazi. Baital-Hikmah.

Beranek, W., & Ranis, G. (Eds.). (1978). Science, technology, and economic development: A historic and comparative study. Praeger Publishers.

Cardwell, D. S. L. (1978). Science, technology and economic development: The British experience. In W. Beranek & G. Ranis (Eds.), Science, technology, and economic development: A historic and comparative study (pp. 23-45). Praeger Publishers.

Hoodbhoy, P. (Ed.). (1998). Education and the state: Fifty years of Pakistan. Oxford University Press.

Tahir, P. (1980). Economic and social thinking of Quaid-e Azam. Research Society of Pakistan, University of Punjab.

Jalil, N. (1998). Pakistan’s education: The first decade. In P. Hoodbhoy (Ed.), Education and the state: Fifty years of Pakistan (pp. 32-45). Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf.

Husain, T. (1996). Pakistan: Role of education for a sustainable future. Zahid Husain Memorial Lecture Number 12. State Bank of Pakistan.

Evenson, R. E., & Singh, L. (1997). Economic growth, international technological spillovers, and public policy: Theory and empirical evidence from Asia. Yale Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 777. Yale University.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31