Pay or not to Pay Dividends: Company Policy and Investor Expectations
Keywords:
Dividend Policies, , investors perception, dividend theoriesAbstract
This paper attempts to understand the linkage of dividend decisions and investors’ perceptions within the context of the Pakistani corporate sector. It is intended to proffer new evidence for designing dividend policies that satisfies investors’ perceptions. Data are collected from individual investors by using questionnaires to obtain opinions about essential factors, patterns, processes and preferences for cash dividends. Results indicate that stability in the rate of dividend, compatibility with the inflation rate and continuity of dividend payment are the topranking factors for investors. Stock dividends are preferred by Pakistani investors if their company is not paying cash dividends, and share buy-back decisions are taken negatively. The theoretical explanation for preferring dividends indicates that Pakistani investors support dividend signaling theory, agency cost, clientele effect, asymmetric information effect, tax effect and rational expectation models. That is why it exhibits a positive relation between dividends and investors’ perception. The contributions and recommendations for further studies are also addressed.
References
Akbar, M., & Baig, H. H. (2010). Reaction of stock prices to dividend
announcements and market efficiency in Pakistan. The Lahore
Journal of Economics, 15(1), 103-125.
Anand, M. (2004). Factors influencing dividend policy decisions of
corporate India. ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 10(2), 5-16.
Asquith, P., & Mullins, D. W. (1986). Signalling with dividends, stock
repurchases, and equity issues. Financial Management, 15(3), 27-44.
Azofra, V., Castrillo, L., & Maria, d. M. D. (2003). Ownership concentration,
debt financing and the investment opportunity set as determinants
of accounting discretion: Empirical evidence from Spain. Spanish
Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y
Contabilidad, 32(115), 215-255.
Babbie, E. R. (2015). The practice of social research (13th ed.): International
Thomson Publishing Services.
Baker, H. K., & Jabbouri, I. (2016). How Moroccan managers view dividend
policy. Managerial Finance, 42(3), 270-288.
Baker, H. K., & Kapoor, S. (2015). Dividend policy in India: New survey
evidence. Managerial Finance, 41(2), 182-204.
Baker, H. K., Powell, G. E., & Veit, E. T. (2002). Revisiting managerial
perspectives on dividend policy. Journal of Economics and Finance,
(3), 267-283.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. The
Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1-32.
Beal, D. J., & Delpachitra, S. B. (2003). Financial literacy among Australian
university students. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics
and Policy, 22(1), 65-78.
Butler, A. W., Grullon, G., & Weston, J. P. (2005). Can managers forecast
aggregate market returns? The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 963-986.
Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An analysis of personal financial literacy
among college students. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 107-128.
Clark-Murphy, M., & Soutar, G. N. (2004). What individual investors
value: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Economic Psychology,
(4), 539-555.
Dong, M., Robinson, C., & Veld, C. (2005). Why individual investors want
dividends. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(1), 121-158.
Dorn, D., & Huberman, G. (2010). Preferred risk habitat of individual
investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(1), 155-173.
Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The
American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.
Ehrhardt, M., & Brigham, E. (2016). Corporate finance: A focused approach (5th
ed.): Cengage Learning.
Gordon, M. J. (1959). Dividends, earnings, and stock prices. The Review of
Economics and Statistics, 42(2), 99-105.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial
behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial
Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jong, A. D., Ronald, V. D., & Chris, V. (2003). The dividend and share
repurchase policies of Canadian firms: empirical evidence based on
an alternative research design. International Review of Financial
Analysis, 12(4), 349-377.
