Earnings Management Through Deferred Taxes Recognized Under IAS 12: Evidence From Pakistan

Authors

  • Abdul Rafay Associate professor of finance and accounting, University of Management and Technology, Lahore.
  • Mobeen Ajmal Lecturer in finance, University of Management and Technology, Lahore

Keywords:

Deferred tax, earnings, IFRS, IAS 12.

Abstract

This study examines earnings management through deferred taxes calculated under the IAS 12 and its impact on firm valuation. The literature finds that book–tax nonconformity leads to better earning quality and a greater association between earnings and future expected cash flows. Given that Pakistan is a pioneering implementer of the International Financial Reporting Standards, our hypothesis is that the components of deferred tax disclosed under the IAS 12 provide value-relevant information to equity investors. We divide deferred tax components into three categories: those arising from (i) operational activities, (ii) investing activities, and (iii) financing activities. These are subdivided to ensure that no value-relevant component is aggregated with a nonvalue-relevant component, which might otherwise lead to an information slack. Our sample includes data on shariah-compliant companies listed on the Karachi Meezan Index (KMI-30). We find that deferred tax line items in firms’ balance sheets are reflected in market prices. Investors also tend to treat deferred tax line items (arising from operating, financing, and investing activities) differently. Furthermore, the value relevance is dissimilar for different components of deferred tax. Investors are wary of deferred tax assets and liabilities when pricing and are likely to penalize firms with a higher deferred tax position.

References

Amir, E., Kirschenheiter, M., & Willard, K. (1997). The valuation of

deferred taxes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(4), 597–622.

Amir, E., & Sougiannis, T. (1999). Analysts’ interpretation and investors’

valuation of tax carry-forwards. Contemporary Accounting Research,

(1), 1–33.

Beechy, T. H. (1983). Accounting for corporate income taxes: Conceptual

considerations and empirical analysis. Toronto, ON: Canadian

Institute of Chartered Accountants.

Brown, J. L., Drake, K. D., & Martin, M. (2013). Are firms myopic? The case

of contracting on performance and risk (Mimeo). Retrieved from

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1659439##

Carnahan, I., & Novack, J. (2002). Two birds, one stone: Would firms

inflate their earnings if it meant more taxes? Forbes, 169(5), 40.

Chambers, R. J. (1968). Tax allocation and financial reporting. Abacus, 4(2),

–123.

Chen, K., & Schoderbek, M. (2000). The 1993 tax rate increase and

deferred tax adjustments: A test of functional fixation. Journal of

Accounting Research, 38(1), 23–44.

Chludek, A. K. (2011). Perceived versus actual cash flow implications of

deferred taxes: An analysis of value relevance and reversal under

IFRS. Journal of International Accounting Research, 10(1), 1–25.

Davidson, S. (1958). Accelerated depreciation and the allocation of

income taxes. The Accounting Review, 33, 173–180.

European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (n.d.). Proactive –

Financial reporting for corporate income taxes [Webpage]. Retrieved

May 2014, from http://www.efrag.org/Front/p177-2-

/Proactive---Financial-Reporting-for-Corporate-IncomeTaxes.aspx

Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (1992). The valuation of the deferred tax liability:

Evidence from the stock market. The Accounting Review, 67(2), 394–

Guenther, D., & Sansing, R. (2000). Valuation of the firm in the presence

of temporary book-tax differences: The role of deferred tax assets

and liabilities. The Accounting Review, 75(1), 1–12.

Hanlon, M. (2005). The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and

cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences. The

Accounting Review, 80(1), 137–166.

Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of

Accounting and Economics, 50(2), 127–178.

Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal?

Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter

involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 126–141.

IFRS Foundation. (n.d.). The unaccompanied IASs and their technical

summaries [Webpage]. Retrieved 28 May 2014, from

http://www.ifrs.org/IFRSs/Pages/IAS.aspx

Joos, P., Pratt, P., & Young, S. D. (2002). Using deferred taxes to infer the

quality of accruals (Mimeo). INSEAD, Paris, and Massachusetts

Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Lev, B., & Nissim, D. (2004). Taxable income, future earnings, and equity

values. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1039–1074.

Livingstone, J. L. (1967). Accelerated depreciation, cyclical asset

expenditures and deferred taxes. Journal of Accounting Research,

(1), 77–94.

Narasimhan, M. S., & Harisha, B. V. (2006). Impact of deferred tax facility

on firm value. The Chartered Accountant, 55(1), 56–63.

Phillips, J., Pincus, M., & Rego, S. (2003). Earnings management: New

evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review,

(2), 491–521.

Downloads

Published

2014-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles