Maneuvering Angry Consumers toward Brand Forgiveness and Repatronage: The Moderating Role of Personality and Recovery Strategies

https://doi.org/10.35536/ljb.2022.v10.i2.a1

Authors

  • Faryal Najam Visiting Teaching Fellow, Faculty of Business Administration Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Sana Azar Associate Professor, Faculty of Business Administration Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Brand hate, forgiveness, personality, recovery strategies, repatronage intentions

Abstract

Brand hate occurs when consumers experience extreme negative emotions towards a particular brand and thus detach themselves from it. With this under consideration, the study investigates two types of recovery strategies. The first is an apology from the brand for not extending the experience it was expected to deliver, while the second is compensation. These recovery strategies can moderate the relationship between brand hate and forgiveness such that the use of recovery strategies generally encourages consumers to forgive the brand and ultimately make a repurchase. Additionally, the role of two consumer personality traits—agreeableness and conscientiousness—are examined to explore the type of recovery strategy that is best suited to consumers who are considering forgiving the brand. We sample a population of 237 working women and empirically test the model. Our findings show that the two
approaches—that is, (i) managing brand hate by offering an apology to the consumer, with a subsequently
high level of agreeableness, and (ii) offering compensation to consumers with a high level of conscientiousness—are significant in minimizing brand hate and making room for forgiveness on the consumer's end. The results also reveal that the interaction between personality type and recovery strategies significantly reduces the impact of hate and amplifies the level of forgiveness such that
consumers eventually intend to repurchase the brand they had previously hated.

References

Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad.

Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1–16.

Abdullahi, A. M., Orji, R., Rabiu, A. M., & Kawu, A. A. (2020). Personality

and Subjective Well-Being: Towards Personalized Persuasive

Interventions for Health and Well-Being. Online Journal of Public

Health Informatics, 12(1), e1.

Abid, M., Shafiq, S., Naz, I., & Riaz, M. (2015). Relationship between

personality factors and level of forgiveness among college.

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(7), 149–154.

Ahmed, S., & Hashim, S. (2018). The moderating effect of brand recovery

on brand hate and desire for reconciliation: A PLS-MGA approach.

International Journal of Business and Society, 19(3), 833–850.

Akoglu, H. E., & Özbek, O. (2021). The effect of brand experiences on brand

loyalty through perceived quality and brand trust: a study on

sports consumers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and

Logistics, 34(10), 2130-2148.

Alba, J. W., & Lutz, R. J. (2013). Broadening (and narrowing) the scope of

brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 265–268.

Albert, N., & Merunka, D. (2013). The role of brand love in consumer‐brand

relationships. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(3), 258–266.

Alić, A., Činjarević, M., & Agić, E. (2020). The role of brand image in

consumer-brand relationships: similarities and differences between

national and private label brands. Management & Marketing, 15(1),

-16.

Alvarez, C., & Fournier, S. (2016). Consumers’ relationships with brands.

Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 129–135.

Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020).

Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from

personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 146(4), 279-323.

Aw, E. C. X., Chuah, S. H. W., Sabri, M. F., & Chong, H. X. (2022). 'We'want

apology! Tailoring service recovery and self-construal to earn

customer forgiveness. International Journal of Services, Economics and

Management, 13(3), 225-242.

Azemi, Y., Ozuem, W., Howell, K, & Lancaster, G. (2019). An exploration

into the practice of online service failure and recovery strategies in

the Balkans. Journal of Business Research, 94, 420–431.

Aziz, R., & Rahman, Z. (2022). Brand hate: a literature review and future

research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 56(7), 2014-2051.

Babcock, S. E., & Wilson, C. A. (2020). Big Five model of personality. The

Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Personality

Processes and Individual Differences, 55-60.

Babin, B. J., Zhuang, W., & Borges, A. (2021). Managing service recovery

experience: effects of the forgiveness for older consumers. Journal of

Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102222.

Bae, G., Lee, S., & Kim, D. (2021). Interactions between service recovery

efforts and customer characteristics: Apology, compensation, and

empowerment. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and

Tourism, 22(2), 218–244.

Bagherzadeh, R., Rawal, M., Wei, S., & Torres, J. L. S. (2020). The journey

from customer participation in service failure to co-creation in

service recovery. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54,

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation

models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

Bainbridge, T. F., Ludeke, S. G., & Smillie, L. D. (2022). Evaluating the Big

Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological

trait scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(4), 749-

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable

distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic,

and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions

and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1),

–26.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-10

Issue

Section

Articles